The tone of this article is biased, bent on denigrating an extraordinary figure. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 126.96.36.199 (talk • contribs) 13 August 2006.
Precisely. Someone, please, work to change this - it's a contemptable piece, typical of its time (1911). [signed, but not logged in: RHG]
This article is a good example of the foolishness of pasting in old Britannica articles. What was once (probably) thought to be a succinct summary of her life looks, now, a lot more like libel. Somebody with more knowledge about her life and works has a lot of cleaning up to do. WtG. Josh a brewer 01:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)