Talk:Gaslamp fantasy

(old talk)

"Girl Genius, although science fiction set in 19th century Europe, does not have a firm emphasis on fantastic Industrial Revolution technology. Elements of other types of fiction are featured, including magic and mythical creatures, and the scientific element of it is less prominent."

-- rlly? Was this written by someone who's read Girl Genius? —Joshua Kronengold (talk) 15:25, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Rename [from "gaslight fantasy"]

This should really be renamed to Gaslamp fantasy, as this is the original term: [1] — 128.189.240.45 (talk) 23:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

 Done and also {done} at the French wikipedia source linked above, some time agoe. -P64 2013-01-10

Different from Steampunk or a type of Steampunk?

I'm having trouble with the assertion that Gaslamp fantasy is not to be confused with Steampunk given the number of examples listed in this article that are uchronic, the existence of Steampunk with unambiguously fantastic elements, the number of cited works claimed by both, and the Kaja Foglio quote that indicates the decision to call Girl Genius "Gaslamp Fantasy" rather than "Steampunk" was more of a business decision than an artistic one. — Holzman-Tweed (talk) 17:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Stardust?

Is Stardust (2007 film) really a gaslamp fantasy-movie? The actual setting with all the magic is in an alternate world, it's more similar to Narnia (world) than anything described in this article. If Stardust really is of this genre, then wouldn't all fantasy novels set in a world similar to 19th century England also be so? I think it should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalligrafi (talk • contribs) 20:55, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

"Gaslamp fantasy" is not the original term.

John Clute and John Grant were using the term "Gaslight romance" in the 90's, long before Kaja Foglio created the term "Gaslamp fantasy." Check out Clute and Grant's The Encyclopedia of Fantasy (1999) and Science Fiction: The Illustrated Encyclopedia (1995) for examples. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.39.51.230 (talk) 00:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Clute produced that illustrated encyclopedia with other collaborators. Cf. The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction by Clute and Nicholls, eds. 1979, 1993, and 2011 (online). ...

I don't know about "the" original term; they're different terms. But anyway, the article's wrong in another way: "The term "gaslamp fantasy" was first coined on April 26, 2006" Yet the linked source makes it pretty clear that Kaja was using the term back when Girl Genius first came out, which is 2001. -- Mindstalk (talk) 14:23, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

... That's a big inconsistency! --P64 (talk) 00:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gaslamp fantasy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070313103808/http://kajafoglio.livejournal.com/60562.html to http://kajafoglio.livejournal.com/60562.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gaslamp fantasy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110517142522/http://www.ugo.com/the-goods/hilarious-web-comics-for-your-interweb-perusal-pleasure?page=3 to http://www.ugo.com/the-goods/hilarious-web-comics-for-your-interweb-perusal-pleasure?page=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

A Night in the Lonesome October?

Would "A Night in the Lonesome October" by Roger Zelazny qualify for entry in the list of Gaslamp fantasy novels? 173.243.178.8 (talk) 23:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

References

Sources needed

The article's been tagged since '09 for needing sources, and the examples in particular must be sourced to establish their significance per WP:IPCV. Hopefully this won't be too much of a problem, though the fact that the article's been tagged for that long raises some concern. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and romance

Perhaps it is not entirely uninteresting that Doyle himself uses the term "romance" to refer to Sherlock Holmes stories in the preface to "The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes": "[...] And so, reader, farewell to Sherlock Holmes! I thank you for your past constancy, and can but hope that some return has been made in the shape of that distraction from the worries of life and stimulating change of thought which can only be found in the fairy kingdom of romance." [2] --Jvs (talk) 17:47, 26 March 2021 (UTC)