Talk:TrueNAS

(Redirected from Talk:FreeNAS)
Latest comment: 21 days ago by HansVonStuttgart in topic Question Regarding Cleanup

What is this? edit

Is this a prebuilt server and configuration, a particular program, a protocol, or what? --Gwern (contribs) 03:56, 13 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is a distribution of FreeBSD. The FreeBSD kernel with some tools that make it act as NAS out of the box.--Grimboy 20:15, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

FreeNAS is a free NAS (Network-Attached Storage) server, supporting: CIFS (samba), FTP, NFS, RSYNC protocols, local user authentication, Software RAID (0,1,5) with a Full WEB configuration interface. FreeNAS takes less than 32MB once installed on Compact Flash, hard drive or USB key. The minimal FreeBSD distribution, Web interface, PHP scripts and documentation are based on M0n0wall.

Minimum Requirements? edit

The documentation is poor about hardware requirements: 96Meg memory and a dedicated system HD of at least 32 Meg. What about CPU? 286 OK? I have a 800Mhz C7 Processor in a Mini-ITX board. How does CPU impact data transfer (10/100/1000) simultaneous user transfer, ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.214.105 (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

your never going to get gb transfer speeds on that cpu! but 100 is going to be fine. Markthemac (talk) 00:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Section needed edit

Minimum system requirements remains an important point. I'm just in the process of building a NAS device (because my off-the-shelf box is 80% full, and I have about twice that capacity of laptop drives ; just ordering SATA cables in another window), and ended up going to the manufacturer's website to discover that it needs an 8GB minimum of RAM. While the box I've got for the job has 4GB, and my previous (2010-ish) with FreeNAS used a 256MB old system.

At least I now know that this system is off the agenda.

Really, system requirements matter! AKarley (talk) 21:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

no online capacity expansion edit

From what I read FreeNAS does not offer the ability to grow the size of the array by swapping in larger disks, but I don't have a proper citation for this. In contrast this is possible to do in Linux distros using mdadm. Shawnc (talk) 18:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Expansion appears to be possible manually via ZFS.[1] Shawnc (talk) 21:57, 25 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

NTFS Write Support edit

It looks like there is NTFS write support as of 0.684b, but I can't be sure from the information on the FreeNAS website due to my technical knowledge gaps. Can someone check and update the page?Gwopy (talk) 14:19, 15 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

iXsystems, 8.0 edit

the change in management of this project to iXsystems in 2009 and new feature set should be added to the main article Antilog (talk) 04:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Agreed on 8.0 feature set. Currently, the features of 8.0 are significantly fewer than those listed in the article, which presumably is written for the older 0.7.x version. 64.7.157.28 (talk) 17:08, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Rewrite edit

In recognition of the fact that NAS4Free is a legally and technologically separate project from FreeNAS and has re-established an independent Wikipedia page, I propose this rewrite of this FreeNAS page: User:Maiklsdeksters/FreeNAS

This is intended to be an accurate portrayal of the shared history of the two projects and the recent developments in the FreeNAS project. Maiklsdeksters (talk) 09:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Version table edit

I'm proposing we add a table of FreeNAS versions, including version, release date, FreeBSD version, major features added, etc. JonathonReinhart (talk) 18:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I know this is late but I just updated the TrueNAS CORE version table and added a TrueNAS SCALE table as well. Wsoteros (talk) 19:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on FreeNAS. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:56, 16 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion: Add TrueNAS CORE 13.0-U3 edit

Add Newest version to the version history table as well as add a few of the features that come with u3. Source: https://www.truenas.com/docs/core/corereleasenotes/#new-feature


Features include:

  • NAS-118505 R50BM needs to be added to webUI codebase
  • NAS-118068 Add R50BM to enclosure mapping code and to keyserver
  • NAS-117923 Upgrade Asigra plugin
  • NAS-117827 New cloud sync provider: “Storj iX” (13 and Angelfish)

Wsoteros (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply


Suggestion: Add TrueNAS SCALE Table with Updated Releases edit

This was originally featured on the page but removed for some reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:358B:7600:38AF:9389:8A47:E18E (talk) 16:50, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Question Regarding Cleanup edit

I have observed that a lot of references are used that are mostly directly and some indirectly related to the subject of the page. Doesn't it breach WP:Reliable sources criteria? If so, should I remove all the sources linked to the subject? Thanks. CheezyMom (talk) 01:38, 28 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

It's best not to remove them in most cases. Phrases used in the bad sources can serve as search terms when looking for better ones. Also there might be links to better sources in the bad source. HansVonStuttgart (talk) 07:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply