Talk:Fearless and United Guards

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Proposed game poster .jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment inserted into article

Note!: There's a similar article in the draft. Please consider that and review it, leave a message on its talk page and discuss. (Please it's a request that this message is not to be deleted before considering the following request.) (Utkarsh555, previously 'Pandey Family' (47.31.187.206) 04:32, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

What about "Fearless and United – Guards" instead of FAU-G

I don't have objections with the history merge of Draft:Fearless and United – Guards into this article. But I feel that the article should be renamed as Fearless and United Guards rather than its acronym. I have seen popular games such as PUBG and COD go with their full names in Wikipedia as PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds and Call of Duty respectlively. Yes I understand most of the sources refer it as FAU-G. Yet majority of us refer PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds as PUBG so why don't we stick with the full name as per Wikipedia:COMMONNAME. If there weren't any specifications about the full name of the game then we can obviously stick with the abbreviation. When I created the article under the title Fearless and United – Guards, I found sources supporting my viewpoints regarding the full name. Abishe (talk) 03:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

I suggest opening an RM discussion as described at WP:RM. —BarrelProof (talk) 02:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

I totally agree on this point Rishi36 (talk) 06:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 November 2020

He say fake in 20 November 2020 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.235.217.171 (talk) 19:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Update

Release date is 26 January 2021 Editor Champ (talk) 04:28, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Please provide the references for your claim. - The9Man ^(Talk) 06:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Image

Add poster of game to wiki page. Nitesh003 (talk) 06:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 January 2021

link to download the game https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ncoregames.faug&hl=en_IN&gl=US Moddu517 (talk) 07:51, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done, WP:ELNO. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 08:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 February 2021

Fearless and united guards game developers shares a 20% profit of the game to the india soldiers. this is a huge contribution from the side of n-core games in the development of india. Dailynewthings (talk) 08:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done, WP:LINKSPAM. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:45, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 4 January 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved -- Aervanath (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

---

Fearless and United–Guards → Fearless and United Guards – There has been some move warring in recent days (five moves since 12 November). The current title is Fearless and United–Guards, but that has only been true for three hours. That title has an unspaced en dash, which seems potentially contrary to MOS:DASH, and I don't see a dash (or hyphen) in the unabbreviated form in most sources. Another issue is whether the conjunction should be capitalised; I believe MOS:CT says it should be lowercase (i.e., "and", not "And"). As best as I can tell after looking at the most recent sources that are cited in the article and considering the WP:MoS, the title should be as proposed (no dash, lowercase "and"). Note that the article's Talk page also has some prior discussion of the title from September–October 2020. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

• Move Support the move back to the original title. I had requested the article to be moved back to the original and proper title at Requested moves which was restored. Then the editor who had moved the page with the wrong title where the "A" in "and" was capitalized, changed it to this new and incorrect title. I've posted a message on his talk page on how to properly start a move discussion and request one at RM. And warned him that another move edit could result in an ANI discussion. But I'm sure the ANI won't happen or be necessary. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
• Support. Common and most natural form of the title. Andrewa (talk) 03:05, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.