Talk:Evangelical counsels

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Catholic Viewpoint? edit

This article appears to me to be presenting the Catholic theology regarding particular teachings of Jesus. This is evidenced by two of the three references being explicitly Catholic sources. I question whether this should be made clearer, or even whether this page would be better placed in the category of articles related to Catholicism. Matt73 (talk) 05:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Other views should be added, citing Wikipedia:Reliable sources of course, as always. 75.15.195.94 (talk) 18:19, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

-furthermore... "The Catholic Church interprets this to mean that they are not binding upon all..." is a false statement. True, there is no requirement for a serious vow of poverty, or obedience to a specific spiritual director, or celibacy (lifelong (or from then on) virginity), as is the case for those with a vocation to the consecrated/official/ordained religious life (nuns and priests, etc.). However, there is still a universal requirement which is binding for all to care/charity for the poor, obedience to the moral catechesis of the Church and to God and His commands, and chastity (not the same as celibacy; you can have chastity while maintaining sexual relations with a spouse). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.207.242.4 (talk) 19:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

All Christians? edit

Cutting this on the obvious ground that, no, not all Christians are called to the single life and to poverty. And the obedience involved is above and beyond that which is required to the Church.

Not only those wishing to dedicate their life to God in the consecrated life, but every one of Jesus's followers is invited to observe chastity, poverty and obedience, since he exhorted all to "be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect" (cf. Matthew 5:48).

64.148.17.213 (talk) 03:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Are there any Wikipedia:Reliable sources that claim all Christians should observe the evangelical counsels? If so, they should be added to the article. Otherwise, wikipedia policy is NOR. 75.15.195.94 (talk) 18:22, 6 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Evangelical counsels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Evangelical counsels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply