Talk:España-class battleship
España-class battleship has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||
España-class battleship is part of the Battleships of Spain series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the España-class battleship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article creation, source edit
Have just created this article (still a "STUB") based on the Spanish Wikipedia similar article on this class and the thips that formed it. It is my intention to translate and adapt those articles, as well as to provide adequate references and sources. This might take me a couple of weeks. Regards, DPdH (talk) 03:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- While I applaud your taking the initiative to create these articles, do be aware that the Spanish articles aren't exactly reliable. I've made a few changes to the Spanish España page but a lack of time has meant I haven't gotten very far with it. All the best. Harlsbottom (talk) 07:35, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:España-class battleship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 00:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Review
- The toolbox checks out.
- Gibbons is in references and further reading.
- Otherwise:
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Passed. - Dank (push to talk) 00:57, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Proposed change edit
Should we change "The España class was a series of three dreadnought battleships built for the Spanish Navy in 1909–1921" to "The España class was a series of three dreadnought battleships built for the Spanish Navy between 1909–1921"? ★★RetroLord★★ 09:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Article title edit
@Parsecboy: Do you know what the article title is for the Our Navy citation? Kees08 (Talk) 06:29, 29 August 2019 (UTC)