Should the E3 articles be renamed to “E3 *year*”? edit

E3 conventions are almost always referred to as “E3 *year*” rather than “Electronic Entertainment Expo 2018,” even in other Wikipedia articles, so every time an E3 convention is mentioned, the wikilink is a redirect. Per WP:COMMONNAME, the most commonly used name should be the title of an article, as long as it’s an official name.

I’ve never read or heard “Electronic Entertainment Expo” anywhere but on Wikipedia, so should these articles not be renamed? Interqwark talk contribs 15:10, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

No, it is still properly called the Electronic Entertainment Expo, E3 is just its abbreviation. People outside the video game or tech industry will not know what E3 is by that abbreviation. --Masem (t) 21:34, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
The convention’s most common name is “E3.” It doesn’t matter whether it’s an abbreviation or not. Interqwark talk contribs 21:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
It is the common name within the gaming press but not within the mainstream press. We want to avoid jargon that would not be recognized by non-gamers. --Masem (t) 21:53, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
All right. Interqwark talk contribs 21:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

E3 highlight edit

Any highlights at E3 this year? TheRealVicarious (talk) 04:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Existing games established at E3 to be on new platforms edit

In cases of established games (like Fortnite) that are newly announced on new platforms, I think we should list all existing platforms but use some type of highlighting (like bold) to indicate the E3 new platform. It looks wrong to say, for example "Fortnite Battle Royale Switch" because it was out for several platforms already. But we can do "Fortnite Battle Royale PC / PS4 / Switch / Xbox One / mobile" is clearer. --Masem (t) 18:58, 14 June 2018 (UTC)Reply