Talk:DuPont Central Research

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Delaware Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Delaware portal This article is supported by WikiProject Delaware (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is great but I suggest renaming it to something like DuPont Central Research Department, the current title is confusing. Also the category Category:Laboratories would be more suitable. V8rik 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I couldn't help but notice that the author uses the past tense when saying "CRD became noted for its research in a number of important areas, but it was the broad range of expertise and cross-fertilization that made it the dynamic force that it was." Is the central research no longer a dynamic force?

Accurate Description edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This presentation accurately reflects the early days of Dupont Central Research. I was on that research staff 1959-1967. Fvhayden (talk) 16:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic