Talk:Core sample

Material merged from coring talk page

Merge proposal

I think Coring and Core sample would go quite well together. Does anyone have any reason the two shouldn't be merged? TastyCakes (talk) 23:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Agree ResMar 15:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

The Coring page within Wikipedia has nothing to do with sampling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.229.143 (talk) 16:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, the articles were merged and the coring article no longer mentions this type of coring, like it used to. TastyCakes (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Multiple Issues

Since I'm sitting on a mobile offshore drilling rig, reading the proposal for coring on the next well, I suppose I'd better go through this article and address multiple issues I see on first read-through. The notes below are as much for my own guidance while modifying the article.

• The materials used in construction of core-cutting equipment are largely irrelevant.
• Methods - at least one numerically frequent type of core is note addressed - "percussion cores", known in the oil industry by various brand names and acronyms such as "SWC".
• The "management" section (perfectly reasonable in itself - that's why we have a core programme before we even get the rig to the location!) contains "techniques" information that would probably be best broken out into a separate section.
• Layering and stratigraphy is often irrelevant to cores cut for mineral projects. (I see a break-out there into dendrochronology, which is perceptive.)

I'll make some alterations in respect of these issues and see what other people have to say.

Comments on my own changes

• Added several different techniques, with discussion of their suitability for different circumstances and limitations on target materials.
• Excised the "methods" material from the "management" section ; that looks like a cut'n'paste from somewhere else anyway. Discussed the data necessary to relate the core sample to the (geological) structure that it samples. The importance of record keeping.
• The "historical" matter in the "management" section is ... well, it's now a separate section.
• Processing techniques ... I've writen something, but the network engineer has just come into the office to do "stuff". So that's me finished.

Aidan Karley (talk) 14:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

The history of core sampling in this article gives no dates and does not tell who did the first core sampling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.149.207.218 (talk) 12:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

""Granitic" rock core from stillwater igneous complex, Montana (from a spoil pile)" captioned picture in "Methods" Section

Please review this caption for correctness.

The core in the picture does not appear to be granitic. Is it a gneiss?

To me, it looks more like a gabbro or a norite.

What do you think?

Thank you for your time,

08Geologist80 21:54, 14 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 08Geologist80 (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Core sample. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050318171038/http://www.egr.msu.edu/schoolcraft/core.htm to http://www.egr.msu.edu/schoolcraft/core.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)