Talk:Charles Ellet Jr.

(Redirected from Talk:Charles Ellet, Jr.)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Dwkaminski in topic GA Reassessment

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Ellet Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:18, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

needs work edit

I did a little triage cleanup on this article yesterday, and was surprised that I couldn't easily find a list of his children nor even his education before Paris. Tho Ellet's career involved many locations, another important factor may have been antipathy toward slavery, as per other Unionist Virginians I've encountered. During my limited time at the local history library, I found no U.S. nor Virginia slave schedules under his name, but also couldn't find his census returns after this marriage (1840, 1850 and 1860, there being a surprising number of people with this last name). I also wondered if he became the only casualty of the battle because of a mechanical issue, reading somewhere long ago that his injuries were due to steam not shrapnel. His vessel rammed the lead Confederate ship, as did another of the Union rams that he had relatives commanded. I noticed the additional reading list included no biographies, and was puzzled by the inclusion of three econometrics articles, with no mention in the text. Plus, the nearest library with public JSTOR access has been closed to non-alumni now for nearly 6 months (in a renovation that was supposed to take a month or 2).Jweaver28 (talk) 15:50, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your comments... I agree and have added his bibliography Risk Engineer (talk) 22:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wounded knee edit

Abbott says that Ellet was wounded by a bullet "pistol ball" in the knee, with the ball stuck hard in the knee joint. Ellet refused to have his leg amputated, which very likely would have saved his life. Ellet said he would rather die than live with one leg. As expected, the injury killed him after infection moved up into his body. Binksternet (talk) 18:03, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

B class review edit

@Dwkaminski: B class. If Ellet's publications are listed in a book, please write "Ellet published the following books and essays.[citation]". If not, we will let it go for now. Also, all the online sources should have access dates. Whether these need to be fixed will be up to the GA reviewer. Djmaschek (talk) 05:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Individual assessment edit

GA Reassessment edit

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Charles Ellet Jr./GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

I had submitted previous for Good Article status but it was rejected. I corrected the errors and submitted to Wikiproject Military History for B-level assessment and received that categorization. I would like to have the page reassessed for Good Article status.Dwkaminski (talk) 16:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply