Talk:List of Paper Mario characters

(Redirected from Talk:Characters in the Paper Mario series)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Grandy02 in topic Well, I guess here we go.

Pictures edit

Can anyone help add pictures? I tried, but it didn't work correctly.... C. Pineda 05:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Getting the hang of pictures now, expect more. C. Pineda 07:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Minor Characters + TTYD Party members edit

This isn't my strongest suit, could anyone help? C. Pineda 20:09, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed Deletion edit

Only few characters are mentioned in the game articles. This is an expansion, including all of the game characters. For example, Paper Mario, the wiki for that game, it doesn't even include the star spirits!, let alone none of the articles have Mario's sidekicks included. This is a compilation of all Paper Mario Characters. I've also heard talk of merging with the Mario series characters. I don't think this should be. This is because Paper Mario is a different series, with different story line, and different characters. Every other single game gets to have their own wiki page for characters. Grant this one, what others have. C. Pineda 19:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

If you believe this then please vioce your opinion in the AFD, as it's more likely to be noticed there. — Malcolm (talk) 20:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

More characters will definetely be added, it just needs a little more time. I'll have to re-play all of the Paper Mario games. If only the other Paper Mario characters articles hadn't been so hastily deleted, then we could have merged them together into a new article. I just recently played through all of the first Paper Mario game so I'm able to contribute a little bit more to this article. 75.185.101.79 14:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

What I don't understand is why this one is being deleted, and other character wikis aren't. I'm not gonna point out others, just in case there are more "Wiki-Crusaders" who feel like deleting anything THEY don't like. But unless you want a HUGE list on individual wikis, then these pages are important. Also, I would like to assist in minor characters from paper Mario:TTYD, but my disk is scratched up and won't read. I'll try to locate and add all the Wizard characters, as they are important to the series. C. Pineda 23:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup edit

I'm going to do some cleanup in this in a bit. Specifically, removing stuff on how to beat bosses, etc., and get rid of the POV. — Malcolm (talk) 13:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I do kinda agree that the way to beat the boss is too much, but what instances of POV are you talking about? C. Pineda (クリス) 23:32, 6 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
There are a few mentions of "friendly", "interesting", and stuff like that. — Malcolm (talk) 00:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Japanese character names edit

I added the Japanese character names straight from the Japanese Wikipedia articles. I have also provided some romanizations. The only "true English translation" I know of is Christina, as it has been mentioned in many sources: [1] [2] [3] etc. --Kaleb.G 22:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. :) — Malcolm (talk) 23:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I wasn't familiar with their Japanese names so I didn't know what to put down, thanks for including that info. Unknown Dragon 19:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Where are they? did someone deleted them? C. Pineda (クリス) 04:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Some unregistered user keeps removing them and I don't know why. The game was originally in Japanese and later translated to English, so the Japanese names are the original character names. I think that is relevant information. Not to mention there are Japanese names present on multiple characters and enemies listed on the respective main Mario series character lists. What's this person's problem? --Kaleb.G 07:28, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
I'll leave a message on their talk page if they remove them again, asking to at least provide a reason. — Malcolm (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. They did it again but I reverted it.
On a side note, I unitalicized the two section titles. I know they're game titles, but I don't think that section titles are normally italicized. It doesn't matter to me, but if they should be italicized after all, Super Paper Mario needs to be as well. --Kaleb.G 05:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
The user has been warned. --Kaleb.G 21:23, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Baby Yoshi's color edit

I read on a FAQ at GameFAQs that his color is based on the amount of time between when you obtain the egg, and when it hatches. I can find the exact FAQ if needed. I never read anything about it being based on the name of the file. --Kaleb.G 22:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Shadowpeach.jpg edit

 

Image:Shadowpeach.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Other major characters in SPM edit

It seems there is an oversight on the list. The other major characters in Super Paper Mario are missing - characters like Merlon, Nolrem, Squirps, and Luvbi. They're all fairly significant (based on what I read about Luigi's partners in TTYD, they're more important than those characters). Aielyn 10:07, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I noticed that too, I haven't completely played Super Paper Mario yet though so I don't know very much about the characters, once I play it through though I will start adding info about the characters from that game. If anyone else can help with this I would appreciate it. Unknown Dragon 14:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

If I have time, I'll help some, too. — Malcolm (talk) 17:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I recently completed the game, so I will be able to go through and add some characters as well clarify some details on the already existing entries. Devonaire 00:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Accidend edit

can you put the fact that Mario and Koops once thought that Kolorado's dead father was Koops' father by mistake?

Mimi edit

I'm pretty sure that Mimi's name has something to do with the Mimivirus, since she can turn into a thing that looks like a virus during some battles. Geekboy72 (talk) 15:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

It comes from taking the "c" at the end off of the word "mimic". 75.15.160.108 (talk) 13:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

A small request. edit

{{editprotected}} Well, I was looking through this, and I noticed it said in the Villains section for Paper Mario: The Thousand-Year Door "A badge in Hooktail Castle allows Mario's attacks to sound like a cricket chirping and is able to weaken her (it she isn't weaken then she's too strong to defeat for the point of the game she encountered in)." And I was wondering if the part in parentheses could be changed to something like "If she isn't weakened, then she's too strong to defeat at the point of the game in which she's encountered." or something to that effect maybe please.

Sort of   Done - neither sentence is anywhere near being encyclopaedic, so I just removed it entirely. Oh, and wherever the merge discussion is actually taking place, I suggest a merge has to take place. This is all unreferenced in-universe stuff, not particularly encyclopaedic. Neil  09:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Edit request: Disambiguate Scottish edit

{{editprotected}} The section on O'Chunks has a link to "Scottish", which is a disambiguation page and should be changed to Scottish English (probably piped to still say Scottish). Of course the next word ascent should be accent. Thanks. Ntsimp (talk) 15:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Done - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Being able to edit again edit

I would very much like to start editting this article again, it says that the article is protected from editting until disputes are resolved, what exactly are the disputes taking place about this article? Unknown Dragon (talk) 19:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

As would I. I noticed a couple disjointed statements on Vivian's section: Vivian is the youngest of the Shadow Siren sisters. Vivian is constantly put down by her oldest sister, Beldam, and blamed for anything that goes wrong. Mario helps her recover her sisters' missing Superbobomb, although Vivian is unaware of who he is. When she discovers his true identity, she is at first hurt, but then joins him. Her Veil move hides Mario in the shadows, protecting him from enemies.
At the least the change in perspective should be standardized, one way or another; as it stands I keep needing to juggle concepts, which is pretty damned awkward, particularly in the midst of a sentence. Octane [improve me] 06.01.08 1020 (UTC)

Mr L and King K edit

You admins forgot to add Mr L to Count Bleck's forces and King K in the Glitz Pit characters. The Winged Yoshi —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Winged Yoshi (talkcontribs) 00:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Status of the page. edit

TTN: I don't have a particular horse in this race, but this is ridiculous. On a strictly procedural note, there's a general presumption that if an article survives AfD it shouldn't be deleted out of process. Since you did not actually merge any information to the series page, you shouldn't redirect the article in a way to make it difficult to access to most users. Now, if you want to discuss the article on the Series page and possibly merge thereafter, then fine, or if you think this content is unsalvageable you can re-AfD it. Let's not have a stupid edit war.

Also, somebody having the article in their sandbox doesn't mean anything. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. SnowFire (talk) 01:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copy any useful info to Super Mario Wiki edit

I have a feeling this is going to be deleted, so I'd recommend taking any useful info and copying it over to the Super Mario Wiki. That's the best place for Mario info anyway. --Kaleb.G (talk) 17:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, I guess here we go. edit

Please list any reasons why this content not be merged. TO begin, I will state why it should be. At no point ever does it acknowledge the necessity to assert notability, nor does it have the attention to the article to fix it. It's no coincidence that cleanup efforts conveniently coincide with AfD disucssions. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 06:41, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Great to know that the extent to which anyone cares for this article starts at keeping it and ends before improving it. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 19:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree with New Age Retro Hippie. More than 70 (!) different characters are listed, yet there is virtually no information on development and reception for a single character of the bunch. But the article includes game guide-like sentences, such as "His move, Refresh, restores Mario's HP and FP by 5." Besides that, the article is simply an unsourced retelling of the storylines, which isn't needed in this form at Wikipedia. --Grandy02 (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply