Talk:Centrifugal-type supercharger

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Reads like an advert edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article reads like a page from an old McCulloch/Paxton supercharger sales folder. The fact that the section offers no drawbacks to centrifugal superchargers should be a red light, especially in the context of applications in automobiles.

Isn't there some Wikipedia rule against things that read like advertisements?Bwob (talk) 16:19, 8 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

There is a Wikipedia article on superchargers. Perhaps this article is redundant.--JHowardGibson (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Delete This?? edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have just proposed the deletion of this page on the grounds that the subject is adequately covered elsewhere. I am searching down through the supercharger page and I see that it links here. I will undo my edit. Does this really need to be a separate page? JHowardGibson (talk) 19:39, 13 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic