Talk:Food photography on social media
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Food photography on social media article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Positive Effects: I added information to a section, "Making food taste better," under the positive effects section because it only had a few points. This article contains an abundant amount of information, however, a particular section, positive effects, was lacking more information than other parts of the article. Therefore, I found information about more positive effects for the subject. SeandempsSeandemps (talk) 20:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC) Seandemps (talk) 03:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seandemps (talk • contribs) 15:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 27 December 2023 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move page. (closed by non-admin page mover) — YoungForever(talk) 21:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Camera eats first → Food photography on social media – The term "camera eats first" is unsuitable as an article title: possibly a WP:Neologism (no evidence that this has been adopted widely); fails WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CRITERIA, as is unlikely to be the obvious search term for a reader to look for an article about photographing food Cnbrb (talk) 20:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC). Cnbrb (talk) 20:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- Support. Agree with nom. It’s a clever title, but it’s a neologism, and exists in a variety of forms. Sorry, but article titles should be bland, not clever. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)