Talk:2006 California's 50th congressional district special election

(Redirected from Talk:California 50th Congressional District Election, 2006)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Candidate Chris Young edit

re: " 05:43, 10 January 2006 68.6.157.145 (Candidate Young's information was not accurate nor fairly portrayed)" - for the record, the information given was not intended to be an unfair portrayal; Young was described as "law student Chris Young" in a (San Diego) North County Times article dated December 29, 2005 [1]; she is described the same way in D.C.'s Political Report [2] and in a Datamar Inc. poll report [3] dated January 9, 2006. In fact, the North County Times continues to refer to her as "law student Chris Young" in an article dated January 12, 2006 [4]. "[S]oon-to-be juris doctor Chris Young" is the description from the candidate's website, and clearly "juris doctor candidate" is the best description of the three. - Biederman 21:42, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Election results edit

The following is a link to the official election results [5] --Asbl 02:54, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Absentee Ballots edit

What's a "mega-precinct"?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.204.207 (talkcontribs) 09:06, 6 September 2006

POV comment removed edit

"Several Rightwing groups also edited the soundbite to make it sound like Busby was encouraging fraudulent voting." Unsourced and POV comment removed until it can be fixed.--G1076 21:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on California's 50th congressional district special election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:12, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on California's 50th congressional district special election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Reply