Talk:Bounds Green tube station

WikiProject Trains / Stations / Rapid transit / in UK / in London

(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

	Trains Portal

	UK Railways Portal
	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Associated projects or task forces:

	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (marked as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (marked as Low-importance).

WikiProject London

(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

London portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Start

This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Retiled = irrelevant?

It seems to me that these two sentences: "When the damage was repaired the platform walls were not retiled. In 1994 the station was renovated and the missing tiles were replaced." - add up to "so there is nothing to see there." It *used* to be relevant, before 94, which is why it's mentioned in older history books, but now there is the plaque, as noted in this article, but nothing else. I suggest that both sentences should be removed. What do you think? 82.45.248.177 01:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree --IsarSteve 04:42, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

↑Jump back a section

Last modified on 7 January 2010, at 23:37