Former featured articleBig Bang is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 23, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 31, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
February 4, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
February 23, 2005Today's featured articleMain Page
August 22, 2005Featured article reviewKept
May 31, 2007Featured article reviewKept
February 29, 2020Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Something magically appeared out of nothing and created everything edit

When there was nothing, something magically appeared and exploded, creating the first and only organized explosion which created order instead of chaos. Then, just the right amount of dust, goo and space sludge mixed together to form life; a single cell organism that eventually turned into a frog, a palm tree, a grasshopper, a whale, a monkey, a blade of grass and a hummingbird. Those spontaneous creations then replicated and grew opposing sexual organs so they could then abandon spontaneous creation and "evolve" into breeders. Meanwhile, the universe continues to grow in every direction, magically creating new planets, stars and solar systems out of an infinite amount of matter that just magically appears. 73.121.109.117 (talk) 03:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

But that's much easier to believe than an intelligent being that spoke the universe into existence and that word continuing on forever, as sound waves do. 73.121.109.117 (talk) 03:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
This isn't the place for a creatio ex nihilo discussion. It's about how to improve the current article. Praemonitus (talk) 04:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Are you sure thats correct 24.253.249.11 (talk) 17:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

BIG BANG edit

I believe you should change the article to be crationist. The Big Bang Theory is not biblicaly accurate. 24.253.249.11 (talk) 17:08, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

This topic is covered by Religious interpretations of the Big Bang theory. Thanks. Praemonitus (talk) 17:18, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion for addition of link edit

Hello, I noticed the first mention of the "FLRW model" does not link to an existing Wikipedia article that further expands on the first use of this acronym, and I believe that it would be a helpful addition for context. OverwhelmingOdds (talk) 00:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Fixed. CWenger (^@) 01:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Needs more sources edit

Every online source I have looked at says there's a lot of evidence disproving the other theories of the beginning of the universe or existence in totality. However, the Wikipedia article mentions only one, a book from 1996. Where are the rest of the sources? Galactiger (talk) 20:45, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've added a link to 'non-standard cosmology' in the 'See also' section. Praemonitus (talk) 01:03, 27 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: English Composition 1102 085 edit

  This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 March 2024 and 2 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jgleana (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Jgleana (talk) 03:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply