Talk:Battle of the Dukla Pass

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Results edit

I would have daoubts about Soviet victory, Russian forces got stuck in the mountain till december, when Germans had to evacuate themselves because Soviet advances in Romania and Hungary. This means, that the battle regarded as defensive battle was won by Germans, they kept the line. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mądrala (talkcontribs)

The above user has made this edit. I'm not sure if this assessment is proper and what it's based on. Is this just one Wikipedia user's opinion? At the very least, it should be backed by citations. I mean, if we're having a chess game and you forfeit the match, then I don't care if you forfeit because you felt you were defeated, or if you forfeit because your mother called with trouble at home: The moment you forfeit and take your figures and go home, I'm still going to claim victory, and rightly so. I'm skeptical of the motives of the above user for wanting to portray the outcome as something, anything other than a Soviet victory. 31.18.253.188 (talk) 17:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

s

A war is much more complicated then chess, we are talking about tactics not politicsMądrala (talk) 21:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Casualties edit

Our unreferenced infobox gives the casualties as 50k for the Germans and 20k for the Soviets. Polish wiki, which has references but not inline, gives them as 70k for the Germans and 120k for the Soviets, going into more descriptions of how bloody this battle was and how high Soviet casualties were. Based on Slovak National Uprising I'd guess that the numbers mean ~21k dead, over 100k total casualties (wounded, missing). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 00:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of the Dukla Pass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:10, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Battle of the Dukla Pass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply