A fact from Areopagus sermon appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Areopagus sermon was the most dramatic and fullest speech of the missionary career of Apostle Paul?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I hear this event cited both by classical apologists and presuppositional apologists as the model for all Christian apologetics, each side claiming it to be exemplary of their particular methods by stressing different parts of the message differently. Peter Kreeft in particular has a lot of interesting stuff to say about this. Maybe some information on the role of this account in Christian apologetics would help the article? --Nerd42 (talk) 20:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
I looked at the page for Christian apologetics now for the first time. It looks like Hurricane Katrina passed through it. It is a mess itself with multi-colored flags at the top. And the talk page was no peaceful event either. Clearly Wikipedia owes an apology to all the readers who click on that page - pun intended.
So while that article needs so much help, discussing that messy topic may lead to further confusion, given that Wikipedia does not successfully tell a reader what "Christian apologetics" are. As a start one needs to tell a reader what apologetics are - and at the moment we (i.e. Wikipedians) have failed there. So I would start thee, get that house in order, before creating further confusion. History2007 (talk) 21:01, 11 May 2011 (UTC)Reply
