Talk:Antique car
| WikiProject Automobiles | (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance) | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Identify this car?
[1] Any ideas or places to post this photo? -- which is PD. TIA, Pete Tillman (talk) 20:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
The example on how to profit from used cars is ridiculous and doesnt belong in an encyclopedia. It should be removed immediately despite its tag as a possible opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.240.33.101 (talk) 06:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
This entire posting on antique cars is so much BS it is impossible to comment on all of it. It should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.195.83.242 (talk) 16:22, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Category:Sad shape
This article has been tagged with no references since August 2008. The title is good but the article is not and at this point is wholly WP:OR. In my opinion it has been a candidate for nomination for AFD, WP:Speedy delete at worse, or Merge at the very least, for a long time. I looked at it to see if there was something I could do but it seems as if it was written (my personal OR) by a person that made a bad deal, on buying or restoring an old car, so would need a complete rewrite.
- What are the options? A rewrite, someone taking it to their page, or an AFD. If this does not get a response then I will try to figure out the process of an uncontested deletion. If someone knows the protocol to submit to AFD or speedy delete it would not hurt my feelings. I took out the OR concerning antique collecting and gambling but would have to delete the whole page to clear up all the problems. If someone would want to follow the procedures to generate possible interest for a rewrite (or other options), then that would be good. Otr500 (talk) 20:29, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
Legal age for antiques
My dad told me that antiques are 100 years old or older, not 45. Classics can be aged from 20-99.
108.249.202.186 (talk) 23:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
- He could be right, but we would be required to attribute that to WP:RS. Has he published any books on the subject? Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 00:20, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
