Talk:Analytical psychology
 | Daily page views
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Analytical psychology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Perspective from mainstream psychology? edit
The Criticism section of the article only cites criticism from within the psychoanalytical movement and some ad hominem attacks. In my opinion, the article desperately needs a section that would juxtapose Jungian psychology with mainstream psychology, especially in the areas where they interact (extraversion-introversion, psychological testing, efficacy of therapy etc.) 91.238.85.132 (talk) 13:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
Move ref 144 original text to footnote edit
"("Le concept jungien d'inconscient collectif "témoigne également de la facilité avec laquelle on peut glisser du concept d'inconscient psychologique vers des perspectives relevant d'un univers de pensée étranger à la tradition philosophique et scientifique dans laquelle ce concept est né'")" This part of the article should probably be a footnote to the attached reference, and not appear as full in-text information. I tend to break references when I try to mess with them, so could someone else do this? Thank you. --IronMaidenRocks (talk) 00:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)