Talk:AHA International School

(Redirected from Talk:American Hebrew Academy)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by 104.162.216.188 in topic Controversy section

Beit Taneen merger edit

An article has been created at Beit Taneen for House 104. Per the notability standards, it does not warrant an article of its own, but it seems to be a useful inclusion here. Barring objections, we'll merge it here. —C.Fred (talk) 16:45, 16 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Actually, is there any support for the merger, or should the article just be deleted? —C.Fred (talk) 01:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)Reply


I think the article on Beit Taneen is worthless and should be deleted. --216.54.213.67 13:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I liked the Beit Taneen page =(. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.50.70.6 (talk) 18:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

In light of the recent news re: Beit Taneen's role in the color war upheaval, I think it would be worth reopening debate on the merger of these two pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.26.122.108 (talk) 21:41, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Only if it's something truly notable that happened. We don't need details on every intramural competition in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Class size? edit

I can find the other information at the Academy's website, but not class size. Other than first-hand knowledge, can anybody point to where we can find the class size info? —C.Fred (talk) 03:34, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is information about class size in the promotional fliers. Unfortunately, I haven't got any of those. ^^; —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.54.213.67 (talk) 23:34, 25 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

i went to the website and have found that the classes are on average 12 students. they like to keep it small for ore hands on activity —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.242.0.232 (talk) 03:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Controversy section edit

Surprisingly there is a controversy section here in this school article. Why? Is it a source of controversy? Between whom? The answer is that it is not controversial, as there is no "strong disagreement or public debate" over the subject. Additionally, there is similar and just as public evidence of malfeasance at much larger and considerably more prestigious schools across the country. Yet, despite this school's relatively tiny size, the article maintains a "controversy" section. See this article regarding St. Paul's School in Concord, NH--noting the eighth paragraph. St. Paul's School. Yet, no mention of this in SPS's article. Or any school article with similar circumstances. Therefore, considering the lack of "controversy" I am deleting this section. --Stoopideggs2 (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The section is probably mislabeled. "Dismissal of arrested staff member" might be a better section heading. However, even though they did everything right, mentioning it—and especially to that length—in the article is giving it undue weight. I agree with the deletion of the section. —C.Fred (talk) 16:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Once again, for the above reasons, this section has been removed. --104.162.216.188 (talk) 03:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on American Hebrew Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:06, 11 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on American Hebrew Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on American Hebrew Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)Reply