Talk:Abiotic component

Abiotic Factor

Some more Abiotic Factors are the temperature of the and rocks basically anything non-living. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.111.240.99 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 17 March 2009‎ (UTC)

Abiotic is not living phyisical object —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.247.96 (talk) 11:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

does it me nonliving parts of the environment — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.110.185 (talk • contribs) 01:32, 1 March 2012‎ (UTC)

Abiogenesis

Would it make sense to add a link to Abiogenesis in this article, considering that abiotic processes may have contributed to form an environment suitable for abiogenesis to eventually occur (in a sense the occurence of life, biotic, from non-life, abiotic)? 76.10.128.192 (talk) 12:39, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

No objection having been raised so far, I have added links to Biotic component and to Abiogenesis. 76.10.128.192 (talk) 02:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Minerals / Vitamins

Would minerals (not bound to an organic substance) be considered biotic or abiotic? The same question is for vitamins, though their nature would seem to be biotic, might there be some that are abiotic?

They are abiotic chemicals present in the environment. Living organisms use them. If vitamins and minerals were generated by living things, then those chemicals would be biotic, but they are not. Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 16:19, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Vitamins are biotic organic substances made by the metabolism of living beings (plants, microorganisms...). Other organisms eat them by predation (herbivores, carnivores).--Miguelferig (talk) 18:36, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Third paragraph

The third paragraph seems kinda unclear and ungrammatical. Clean up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.5.106.186 (talk) 14:47, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Abiotic component. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130608071757/http://www.eoearth.org/article/Abiotic_factor?topic=49461 to http://www.eoearth.org/article/Abiotic_factor?topic=49461
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050425160041/http://www.botany.uwc.ac.za/SCI_ED/grade10/ecology/abiotic/abiot.htm to http://www.botany.uwc.ac.za/sci_ed/grade10/ecology/abiotic/abiot.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Science

Yiee 120.29.108.116 (talk) 00:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)