Talk:2018 Commonwealth Games

      WikiProject Multi-sport events (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
      WikiProject icon 2018 Commonwealth Games is within the scope of WikiProject Multi-sport events. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
      C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
       Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
       
      WikiProject Commonwealth
      This article is within the scope of WikiProject Commonwealth, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Commonwealth of Nations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. WikiProject icon
       
      WikiProject Australia / Queensland / Sports (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
      WikiProject icon 2018 Commonwealth Games is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
      C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
       Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
      Taskforce icon
      This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (marked as High-importance).
      Taskforce icon
      This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports.
       

      Confirmed Potential Bids ???

      Isn't this a contradiction? GetDownAdam (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

      ↑Jump back a section

      Flags

      These flags in the article are purely decorative and as such should be remove per WP:FLAGCRUFT --Merbabu (talk) 08:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

      ↑Jump back a section

      Use of Field hockey

      It is standard here on wikipedia no matter what event it is to list if its ice or field hockey. See [[1] Intoronto1125TalkContributions 01:35, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

      You are so rude, or incompetent at discussion. I already gave you a very relevant example on your own Talk page of a usage of just "Hockey" for a Commonwealth Games page (Venues of the 2010 Commonwealth Games), but you ignored it. Now that you have brought this to a wider audience, let's bring my points here too...
      Ice Hockey is a very minor sport in the Commonwealth (apart from in your country, Canada), and when someone in Australia (or the rest of the Commonwealth) says or writes "hockey" they mean what Canadians know as "field hockey". Just to be sure, I checked the two obvious external sources, as we're supposed to do here. Both the Commonwealth Games Federation and the website for the 2018 Games use ONLY the name "hockey". Here is the relevant text from the second site....
      "The existing home of the Gold Coast Hockey Centre at Keith Hunt Park, Labrador will be upgraded to host the Hockey competition for the 2018 Commonwealth Games. The redevelopment of the venue will provide for three all-weather synthetic pitches and will include seating for 5,000 spectators. The redevelopment will establish the Centre as Queensland’s premier Hockey venue, providing a valuable, world-class competition and training venue for current and future athletes and the Gold Coast City community."
      To be fair to Canadians, the only Commonwealth residents likely to be confused, and folks from non-Commonwealth countries, it's OK to indicate that it's what you call field hockey that we're talking about, and that's what the text you just reverted did. You really must broaden your knowledge and do some research. HiLo48 (talk) 01:56, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
      This has nothing to do with the venue! Can you read and understand what I am trying to say? Clearly not! Maybe that is why you claim to think I can't discuss, but in fact you can't read. EVERY multi-sporting event featuring either form of hockey is linked to either ice or field. I mean every. I even provided an example above, yet you can't understand what I am trying to say. Intoronto1125TalkContributions 02:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
      [After Edit conflict] No, it's you who is failing to comment on what others say, and not demonstrating logical thought. You showed one example. That doesn't prove that "EVERY multi-sporting event featuring either form of hockey is linked to either ice or field." I showed an example, a very relevant example because it was for the Commonwealth Games, where it didn't so link, and about which you have failed to comment. It disproves your argument completely, because you made such an absolute claim. And it would be nice if you would spend some more time on this discussion before changing the article again. It is YOU who is edit warring. HiLo48 (talk) 02:38, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
      1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 this being an event in Australia, 18, 19, 20, 21 :21 and counting examples Intoronto1125TalkContributions 02:51, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
      So long as there is one contrary example, such as the one I provided, no list of examples of any size will prove that your preferred form is used in EVERY case. HiLo48 (talk) 02:56, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
      This is taken from the 2010 Winter Olympics Page.
      Venue Location Sports Capacity Ref.
      Canada Hockey Place[n 1] Vancouver Ice hockey (final) 18,630 [1]
      I have no problem with it being displayed as hockey for the obvious reasons, but should it not be linked to field hockey as hockey just links to the broad list of hockey variations? Krazytea(talk) 18:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
      As it appears that has been done I think that is the only issue here and has been resolved already. Krazytea(talk) 18:25, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
      ↑Jump back a section

      The logo was removed by an IP, because (a) it's outdated, and (b) it's under copyright. Now, (b) isn't an issue since it was included under fair use. With (a), a new file will need to be uploaded, presumably from this website, which doesn't have the words "candidate city". StAnselm (talk) 00:30, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

      I've uploaded a new version of the logo under a claim of fair use. Unfortunately it has a coloured background is a JPG unlike the transparent SVG which was before. If anyone can find a better version of the new logo, please feel free to replace it. Themeparkgc  Talk  00:31, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


      Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist}} template (see the help page).

      ↑Jump back a section
      Last modified on 31 May 2012, at 00:31