Talk:2000 Monaco Grand Prix

Reference Errors

If you find any reference errors, please list them here.

The Official Formula 1 Website contains an error - Pedro de la Rosa is listed as "DNS". He was not present at the restart, but because he did take the original start of the race, he should be listed as "Ret" to follow the WikiProject Formula One policy regarding DNS entries. Bobby Doorknobs 18:42, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
ChicaneF1.com contains an error - Pedro de la Rosa is missing from this list alltogether. See previous error. Bobby Doorknobs 18:42, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:02, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Red flag mistake

According to http://www.formula1.com/results/season/2000/57/ the use of the red flag was a mistake. violet/riga _^[talk] 08:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 Monaco Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 22:13, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Numbers between one and twelve should be spelled out.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No edit wars going on.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Fix the issues with the numbers and it's a pass. If Featured Article status is something you intend to push this article towards, then number between one and twelve should be spelled out. Other than that, I hereby give 2000 Monaco Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 22:16, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2000 Monaco Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150711102519/http://www.crash.net/f1/2000/championship/content.html to http://www.crash.net/f1/2000/championship/content.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 17 June 2017 (UTC)