Talk:Steve Biko Artillery Regiment

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Steve Biko Artillery Regiment article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: African / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

South Africa: African military history Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the African military history task force.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Far too many names edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The history section of this article contains far too many names of people who are simply not significant. The only names that "deserve" to be mentioned in an article such as this are people who already have Wikipedia articles or are clearly notable enough to have articles about them. Quite frankly that won't happen for anyone below the rank of Colonel. Nobody (except people who personally know them or served in the unit themselves) cares what various Sergeants and Lieutenants did. The effect of having so many names is to make the article look like it was lifted out of the regiment's "old boys" newsletter. Roger (talk) 09:35, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi Rodger, the reason why lower ranks were mentioned is because the Regiment took a few years to build to full strength and began with a handful of the leader group. These members went on to become field ranks and senior NCO's but were responsible for contributing towards the full growth of the regiment. Same with Airborne Supply, began and grew from a second Lieutenant into the Air Supply it is today. Airborne!91.72.134.108 (talk) 14:59, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

OK, but it's still not acceptable encyclopedic style. Read some other "fully developed" articles about military units, you will see only a few key people are mentioned by name. Roger (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic