In probability theory, Lindeberg's condition is a sufficient condition (and under certain conditions also a necessary condition) for the central limit theorem (CLT) to hold for a sequence of independent random variables.[1][2][3] Unlike the classical CLT, which requires that the random variables in question have finite variance and be both independent and identically distributed, Lindeberg's CLT only requires that they have finite variance, satisfy Lindeberg's condition, and be independent. It is named after the Finnish mathematician Jarl Waldemar Lindeberg.[4]

Statement edit

Let   be a probability space, and  , be independent random variables defined on that space. Assume the expected values   and variances   exist and are finite. Also let  

If this sequence of independent random variables   satisfies Lindeberg's condition:

 

for all  , where 1{…} is the indicator function, then the central limit theorem holds, i.e. the random variables

 

converge in distribution to a standard normal random variable as  

Lindeberg's condition is sufficient, but not in general necessary (i.e. the inverse implication does not hold in general). However, if the sequence of independent random variables in question satisfies

 

then Lindeberg's condition is both sufficient and necessary, i.e. it holds if and only if the result of central limit theorem holds.

Remarks edit

Feller's theorem edit

Feller's theorem can be used as an alternative method to prove that Lindeberg's condition holds.[5] Letting   and for simplicity  , the theorem states

if  ,   and   converges weakly to a standard normal distribution as   then   satisfies the Lindeberg's condition.


This theorem can be used to disprove the central limit theorem holds for   by using proof by contradiction. This procedure involves proving that Lindeberg's condition fails for  .

Interpretation edit

Because the Lindeberg condition implies   as  , it guarantees that the contribution of any individual random variable   ( ) to the variance   is arbitrarily small, for sufficiently large values of  .

Example edit

Consider the following informative example which satisfies the Lindeberg condition. Let   be a sequence of zero mean, variance 1 iid random variables and   a non-random sequence satisfying:

 

Now, define the normalized elements of the linear combination:

 

which satisfies the Lindeberg condition:

 

but   is finite so by DCT and the condition on the   we have that this goes to 0 for every  .

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Billingsley, P. (1986). Probability and Measure (2nd ed.). Wiley. p. 369. ISBN 0-471-80478-9.
  2. ^ Ash, R. B. (2000). Probability and measure theory (2nd ed.). p. 307. ISBN 0-12-065202-1.
  3. ^ Resnick, S. I. (1999). A probability Path. p. 314.
  4. ^ Lindeberg, J. W. (1922). "Eine neue Herleitung des Exponentialgesetzes in der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung". Mathematische Zeitschrift. 15 (1): 211–225. doi:10.1007/BF01494395. S2CID 119730242.
  5. ^ Athreya, K. B.; Lahiri, S. N. (2006). Measure Theory and Probability Theory. Springer. p. 348. ISBN 0-387-32903-X.