@Quentin X: Sharper and clearer are difference things. Much of the text on your upload is quite illegible because it's been sharpened by an image resizer. The level of distortion is jarring and it's as clear as day. Plus the whole pixel count thing... that's indisputable mate. I don't want to make a big thing of this but I HATE it when I've gone out of my way to make improvements and someone reverts them for no other reason than ownership. Claim it as yours if that's what you care about but upload my file please because that's how the poster is supposed to look. Cheers. Have a nice day. — Film Fan 17:38, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Sorry, I fail to see how you can say it is clearer. To my naked eye, it looks exactly the same, regardless of the pixel count. It's not my intention to claim ownership as a lot of my poster uploads have been uploaded over, and quite a lot of those by yourself. It's just that I HATE my image being uploaded over when I can see no improvement. And I can't. Stay frosty. Quentin X (talk) 17:52, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Seriously. Come off it. Did you click the link? I'll repeat myself. Your image has been sharpened, and the text is illegible. It's not a true representation of the poster. Anyway, if you don't revert it yourself, I will because this is nonsense. Pixel count and clear visual distortion. — Film Fan 22:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
- Right, I see this now. I can only see one image on the comparison, for some reason, but having had another look at it and then compared it with the one that I've uploaded, you are right. Humble etc. Crack on. Quentin X (talk) 06:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
