File talk:Semfac01.png

Image comment

This is fucking disgusting -- on so many different levels.

I agree. For God's sake, the woman looks like she just woke up after having been given a roofie and was subsequently raped. I won't even mention the interracial offense that this illustration causes for many people--white and black alike. Here's a compromise: make the woman less drugged-out and change the race of the man so that he is white (or change woman's race to match man's). Vasbyt84 (talk) 18:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

What is offensive about an interracial couple? Should we go through all Wikipedia images to make sure the white people and black people are segregated? It has never been Wikipedia's policy to change articles and images such that racists aren't offended. Bilz0r (talk) 02:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

No, see, he didn't even mention "the interracial offense", so it's okay. Anyway yeah, fucked up pic, woman's near tears, delete. Echeneida (talk) 04:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

This image is ridiculous. I know that Wikipedia is uncensored, but this image is really just sick. Especially when it starts to get used for vandalism. VandalismDestroyer | Talk to me 01:17, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm kind of thinking that the girl could at least have a neutral expression on her face. Right now she looks really sad. I've never seen a girl look that sad with semen on her face. Some have looked pissed of or disgusted, but not sad. But I suppose someone will take offense if the image is redrawn to make her like it, so just go for neutral, and I'll be happy. 79.138.164.136 (talk) 11:24, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Most people consider semen to be rather icky, especially if it's all over their face. This picture is rather close to reality, unlike most porn. --84.250.87.60 (talk) 16:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

She should be happier to get it!--90.128.75.121 (talk) 16:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

If it's offensive, you shouldn't be looking up "cum shot". Does she have to look so miserable though? 24.228.33.45 (talk) 19:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

She looks sad because this wasn't taking place in a bedroom. She was sitting in a subway car and some homeless guy just did this to her out of nowhere.

No comrade, she looks sad because her face is featured on Wikipedia and for the world to see. 99.32.57.120 (talk) 15:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I agree with the comments about the woman's expression. The racial comments would be ridiculous if the woman did not look outright sad. But, as it is, this image could be understood as a forced facial. --201.47.225.61 (talk) 02:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion

I nominate this image for deletion as it is pornographic and offensive. It serves no constructive purpose. Axeman (talk) 21:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Crazy people

Some Wikipedia users are just mad! How can you seriously complain about this image? You surely only found the image by searching for the original article therefore if you are interested in the article then a picture is quite handy. But kids might see the picture I hear you moan. Yes and they might also find your dildo in your bed side table and your husbands stack of pornos in the garage. If you are stupid enough to let your young kids surf freely on the Internet then what do you expect? The image seems very appropriate for what it's meant to represent. If the women were smiling then people would complain that she looked unnaturally happy. If both people were white then someone would cry foul. If only a bit of cum was on her face then someone would says it's not enough and even now I'm sure some might say that there's not enough. Those complaining about this image are seriously moronic.--217.203.162.8 (talk) 02:05, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm not crazy. And I didn't find this image by looking it up. I think this image is overly graphical for a Wikipedia article. Images like File:DCNG-levrette.jpg are more sutable. There's no coloring, no facial expression, not racials. I wouldn't nominate it for delition, but it would be nice if it were replaced with something els. --Steinninn 02:52, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

This picture is the funniest thing I've ever seen in my entire life. 97.118.172.113 (talk) 06:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I have to agree with the above user, It's pretty f***ing disgusting but the expression is hilarious.--Jack Cox (talk) 06:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

It always breaks my heart to see pretty girls looking sad :( --Topclaw (talk) 17:48, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah don't be such a wuss 84.84.252.137 (talk) 21:30, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

This picture

I see there is a lot of criticism over this picture, which i think is unfounded since the graphic merely means to depict the act of ejaculating on someone's face. As for the racial difference, totally irrelevant and the criticism of this is just an insult to the artist whom definitely deserves respect for this contribution and a bunch more I have found from the same user. thanks --Camilo Sanchez (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't mind the criticism, I just don't want to see it censored. Period. The representation is powerful. Keep it. So what? It's one artist's take on something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wtfwtfisgoingon (talk • contribs) 01:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

blatantly racist.

Hey Sanchez no need to be a closet racist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.165.165 (talk) 16:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

More like Dirty Sanchez.

This picture

This picture is fucking disgusting. I suggest we replace it with a picture of a white man nutting all over a black woman's face, and then see how "uncensored" Wikipedia is. kthx Shinra75 ^{[ Talk ]} 11:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

I find this picture to be found disgusting utterly disgusting. Neurosys (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

I have no problem with the image, some people get off on stuff like this so it's just as valid as any other sex act beyond intercourse, but I admit that the chick looks decidedly unhappy about the whole ordeal. I think if she didn't look like she was kidnapped and sold into sex slavery prior to the encounter I think the reaction would be decidedly less critical by a lot of people. Effedup — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.188.97.36 (talk) 17:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)