File talk:MaryPoppinsChimneyDance.gif

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Easchiff in topic Animated .gif & non-free image size

Animated .gif & non-free image size

edit

Ronhjones has tagged this image for size reduction using the now standard file size criterion. This criterion was developed for static .jpg files. The present image is an animated .gif. I don't think the size criterion was intended to apply to this situation, and I think it needs discussion before being applied here. No one image in the animated series would violate the size criterion. I have searched for discussion of this issue elsewhere, but didn't discover it. I've temporarily placed the "size reduce" template into notes bracket until this can be done. Easchiff (talk) 09:51, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

And here's a link to a legal discussion of free use and animated .gif files: "Is that even legal? Animated GIFs and copyright law". Retrieved 2017-09-11.
@Easchiff: Unlikely that anyone else will read the above. You need to bring this up at Wikipedia_talk:Non-free_content, so a guideline can be added (if necessary) to Wikipedia:Non-free_content - there is not that much about non-free movies, they are rather rare. FWIW, your image would be down to 438 x 228 if we used the standard image guideline. Ronhjones  (Talk) 13:35, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Ronhjones: OK, I'll bring it up there. Do you happen to know what the little robot does to animated .gif files when it reduces them? The small reduction of size isn't a big concern. Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 16:41, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Easchiff: We have no bot for GIFs - yet, I'm trying for approval (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/RonBot_2), animated will not be done this way (it would just do the first frame!) - one needs to use https://ezgif.com/resize. I think we need a guideline though, as some bright spark will upload a large 2 frame gif that hardly moves, and claim "fair use". Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Ronhjones: The tool you located looks excellent. Nonetheless, let's float the question in the appropriate place. I'll take the lead, but give me a day or two on that. Easchiff (talk) 19:03, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply