This file is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this file or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
This file is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... it does have content. This is not a CSD A3. On the copyright issue, this file is basically chemical structures and should fall under PD-chem --EdChem (talk) 14:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
I note these removed comments by 175.38.163.188. The image is of a retrosynthetic analysis and of questionable value to the article, especially as the related article has copyvio issues. The file was not, however, eligible for A3 deletion. The structures are PD-chem, but the analysis and lifting it from the Abstract of the related paper (doi:10.1021/ol303272w may make this a G12... not sure... maybe DMacks can advise. EdChem (talk) 06:59, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
