Wikipedia

Branhamism

Not to be confused with Brahmanism.

"Branhamism" (also known as "Branhamology"[1]) refers to the unique theology and key doctrines taught by William Marrion Branham, including his eschatological views, annihilationism, oneness of the Godhead, predestination, eternal security, and the serpent's seed.[2] Branham's followers refer to his teachings collectively as "The Message".[3]

Image

Most of Branham's teachings have precedents within sects of the Pentecostal movement or in other non-Pentecostal denominations.[4] The doctrines Branham imported from non-Pentecostal theology and the unique combination of doctrines that he created as a result led to widespread criticism from Pentecostal churches and the Charismatic movement.[4][5] His unique arrangement of doctrines, coupled with the highly controversial nature of the serpent seed doctrine, caused the alienation of many of his former supporters.[4][5][6]

The Full Gospel tradition, which has its roots in Wesleyan Arminianism, is the theology generally adhered to by the Charismatic movement and Pentecostal denominations.[3] Branham's doctrines are a blend of both Calvinism and Arminianism, which are considered contradictory by many theologians; the teachings have been described as "jumbled and contradictory and difficult to categorize".[7] As a result, the theology he developed in the later years of his life seemed "complicated and bizarre" to many people who admired him personally during the years of the healing revival.[5] Many of his followers regard his sermons as oral scripture and believe Branham had rediscovered the true doctrines of the early church.[3]

Divine healing edit

Further information: Faith healing § Christianity, and Deliverance ministry

Throughout his ministry, Branham taught a doctrine of faith healing that was often his central teaching during the healing campaign.[8] He believed healing was the main focus of the ministry of Jesus Christ and believed in a dual atonement; "salvation for the soul and healing for the body".[8] He believed and taught that miracles ascribed to Christ in the New Testament were also possible in modern times.[8]

Branham believed that all sickness was a result of demonic activity and could be overcome by the faith of the person desiring healing.[8] Branham argued that God was required to heal when faith was present.[8] This led him to conclude that individuals who failed to be healed lacked adequate faith.[8] Branham's teaching on divine healing were within the mainstream of Pentecostal theology and echoed the doctrines taught by Smith Wigglesworth, Bosworth, and other prominent Pentecostal ministers of the prior generation.[8]

Restorationism edit

Further information: Restorationism

Of all of Branham's doctrines, his teachings on Christian restorationism have had the most lasting influence on modern Christianity.[9] Charismatic writer Michael Moriarty described his teachings on the subject as "extremely significant" because they have "impacted every major restoration movement since".[10] As a result, Moriarty concluded Branham has "profoundly influenced" the modern Charismatic movement.[11] Branham taught the doctrine widely from the early days of the healing revival, in which he urged his audiences to unite and restore a form of church organization like the primitive church of early Christianity.[9]

The teaching was accepted and widely taught by many of the evangelists of the healing revival, and they took it with them into the subsequent Charismatic and evangelical movements. Paul Cain, Bill Hamon, Kenneth Hagin, and other restoration prophets cite Branham as a major influence. They played a critical role in introducing Branham's restoration views to the Apostolic-Prophetic Movement, the Association of Vineyard Churches, and other large Charismatic organizations.[9] The Toronto Blessing, the Brownsville Revival, and other nationwide revivals of the late 20th century have their roots in Branham's restorationist teachings.[9]

The teaching holds that Christianity should return to a form mirroring the primitive Christian church.[9] It supports the restoration of apostles and prophets, signs and wonders, spiritual gifts, spiritual warfare, and the elimination of non-primitive features of modern Christianity.[9] Branham taught that by the end of the first century of Christianity, the church "had been contaminated by the entrance of an antichrist spirit".[10] As a result, he believed that from a very early date, the church had stopped following the "pure Word of God" and had been seduced into a false form of Christianity.[10]

He stated the corruption came from the desire of early Christianity's clergy to obtain political power, and as a result became increasingly wicked and introduced false creeds.[10] This led to denominationalism, which he viewed as the greatest threat to true Christianity.[10] Branham viewed Martin Luther as the initiator of a process that would result in the restoration of the true form of Christianity, and traced the advancement of the process through other historic church figures.[12] He believed the rapture would occur at the culmination of this process.[12] Although Branham referred in his sermons to the culmination of the process as a future event affecting other people, he believed he and his followers were fulfilling his restoration beliefs.[13]

Annihilationism edit

 
Charles Parham, an early leader of Pentecostalism and preacher of annihilationism
Further information: Annihilationism

Annihilationism, the doctrine that the damned will be totally destroyed after the final judgment so as to not exist, was introduced to Pentecostalism in the teachings of Charles Fox Parham (1873–1929).[14] Not all Pentecostal sects accepted the idea.[15] Prior to 1957, Branham taught a doctrine of eternal punishment in hell.[16] By 1957 he began promoting an annihilationist position in keeping with Parham's teachings.[14]

He believed that "eternal life was reserved only for God and his children".[14] In 1960, Branham claimed the Holy Spirit had revealed this doctrine to him as one of the end-time mysteries.[17] Promoting annihilationism led to the alienation of Pentecostal groups that had rejected Parham's teaching on the subject.[17]

Godhead edit

Further information: Oneness Pentecostalism

Like other doctrines, the Godhead formula was a point of doctrinal conflict within Pentecostalism.[17] As Branham began offering his own viewpoint, it led to the alienation of Pentecostal groups adhering to Trinitarianism.[17] Branham shifted his theological position on the Godhead during his ministry.[17] Early in his ministry, Branham espoused a position closer to an orthodox Trinitarian view.[17]

By the early 1950s, he began to privately preach the Oneness doctrine outside of his healing campaigns.[17] By the 1960s, he had changed to openly teaching the Oneness position, according to which there is one God who manifests himself in multiple ways; in contrast with the Trinitarian view that three distinct persons comprise the Godhead.[18]

Branham came to believe that trinitarianism was tritheism and insisted members of his congregation be re-baptized in Jesus's name in imitation of Paul the Apostle.[19] Branham believed his doctrine had a nuanced difference from the Oneness doctrine and to the end of his ministry he openly argued that he was not a proponent of Oneness doctrine.[19] He distinguished his baptismal formula from the Oneness baptism formula in the name of Jesus by teaching that the baptismal formula should be in the name of Lord Jesus Christ.[19] He argued that there were many people named Jesus but there is only one Lord Jesus Christ.[19] By the end of his ministry, his message required an acceptance of the oneness of the Godhead and baptism in the name of Lord Jesus Christ.[7]

Opposition to modern culture edit

Further information: Holiness movement § Relation and reaction to Pentecostalism, and Asceticism § Christianity

As Branham's ministry progressed, he increasingly condemned modern culture.[20] According to Weaver, Branham's views on modern culture were the primary reason the growing Charismatic movement rejected him; his views also prevented him from following his contemporaries who were transitioning from the healing revival to the new movement.[20] He taught that immoral women and education were the central sins of modern culture.[21] Branham viewed education as "Satan's snare for intellectual Christians who rejected the supernatural" and "Satan's tool for obscuring the 'simplicity of the Message and the messenger'".[21] Weaver wrote that Branham held a "Christ against Culture" opinion,[21] according to which loyalty to Christ requires rejection of non-Christian culture.[22]

Pentecostalism inherited the Wesleyan doctrine of entire sanctification and outward holiness from its founders, who came from Wesleyan-influenced denominations of the post-American Civil War era.[23] The rigid moral code associated with the holiness movement had been widely accepted by Pentecostals in the early twentieth century.[18][24] Branham's strict moral code echoed the traditions of early Pentecostalism but became increasingly unpopular because he refused to accommodate mid-century Pentecostalism's shifting viewpoint.[18][25] He denounced cigarettes, alcohol, television, rock and roll, and many forms of worldly amusement.[26]

Branham strongly identified with the lower-class roots of Pentecostalism and advocated living an ascetic lifestyle.[26] When he was given a new Cadillac, he kept it parked in his garage for two years out of embarrassment.[26] Branham openly chastised other evangelists, who seemed to be growing wealthy from their ministries and opposed the prosperity messages being taught.[26] Branham did not view financial prosperity as an automatic result of salvation.[26] He rejected the financial aspects of the prosperity gospel that originated in the teachings of Oral Roberts and A. A. Allen.[26] Branham condemned any emphasis on expensive church buildings, elaborate choir robes, and large salaries for ministers, and insisted the church should focus on the imminent return of Christ.[26][27]

Branham's opposition to modern culture emerged most strongly in his condemnation of the "immorality of modern women".[26] He taught that women with short hair were breaking God's commandments and "ridiculed women's desire to artificially beautify themselves with makeup".[28] Branham believed women were guilty of committing adultery if their appearance was intended to motivate men to lust, and viewed a woman's place as "in the kitchen".[28] Citing the creation story in which Eve is taken from Adam's side, Branham taught that woman was not part of God's original creation, and she was a byproduct of man.[25]

There is nothing designed to stoop so low, or be filthy, but a woman. A dog can't do it, a hog can't do it, a bird can't do it. No animal is immoral, nor it can be, for it is not designed so it can be. A female hog can't be immoral, a female dog can't be immoral, a female bird can't be immoral. A woman is the only thing can do it. She is designed, alone, for filth and unclean living. ... A dog can't, and no other female can. It's just the woman that can. A dog or any other animals, once a year, and that for her babies; not for sexual pleasure, but for her babies. The old sow hog, the old slut dog, once a year, one moment, that's for her babies. But a woman is designed for any time she desires. ... A woman is a by-product of a man. She's not even in the original creation. That's exactly right. ... By her beauty and her sex control, her shape that was given to her by Satan, the by-product that Satan did, she is sent to deceive sons of God. And she can sway more of them to hell than any other instrument Satan has got. That's exactly right. Only a piece, scrap, made of a man, to deceive him by; God made it, right here has proved it. That's what she was made for.

— William Branham, Marriage and Divorce, February 21, 1965

According to Weaver, "his pronouncements with respect to women were often contradictory".[25] Branham once told women who refused to dress according to his instructions "not to call themselves Christians" but qualified his denunciations by affirming that obedience to the holiness moral code was not a requirement for salvation.[25] While he did not condemn women who refused the holiness moral code to Hell, he insisted they would not be part of the rapture.[25]

Weaver wrote that Branham's attitude to women concerning physical appearance, sexual drive, and marital relations was misogynistic,[29] and that Branham saw modern women as "essentially immoral sexual machines who were to blame for adultery, divorce and death. They were the tools of the Devil."[21] Some of Branham's contemporaries accused him of being a "woman hater", but he insisted he only hated immorality.[25] According to Edward Babinski, women who follow the holiness moral code Branham supported regard it as "a badge of honor".[30]

Serpent seed, Predestination, & Race edit

Further information: Serpent Seed, Original Sin, Conditional election, and Unconditional election

Branham taught an unorthodox doctrine on the source of original sin.[4] He believed that the story of the fall of man in the Garden of Eden is allegorical and interpreted it to mean that the serpent had sexual intercourse with Eve, and their offspring was Cain.[4][31][32] Branham also taught the belief that Cain's modern descendants were masquerading as educated people and scientists,[33] and were "a big religious bunch of illegitimate bastard children"[34][35] who comprised the majority of society's criminals.[36] He believed that the serpent was an intelligent human-like ape he described as the missing link between the chimpanzee and man.[37][38] Branham believed that the serpent was transformed into a reptile snake after it was cursed by God.[39]

Branham believed the term "predestination" was widely misunderstood and preferred to use the word "foreknowledge" to describe his views. Branham's teachings on Predestination were deeply connected to his serpent seed doctrine.[40] Branham taught that humanity's choice in salvation was negated by their ancestry, and that genetics determined one's eternal destiny; the offspring of Cain were foreordained to damnation while the offspring of Seth were foreordained to salvation.[41]

Weaver commented that Branham seemed unaware that his teachings conflicted with free will,[40] and that he taught a Calvinistic form of the doctrine of predestination and openly supported Calvin's doctrine of Eternal Security, both of which were at odds with the Arminian view of predestination held by Pentecostalism.[7] Unlike his views on the Godhead and Annihilationism, there was no precedent within Pentecostalism for his views on predestination, and opened him to widespread criticism.[19] Branham lamented that more so than any other teaching, Pentecostals criticized him for his predestination teachings.[40]

According to Steven Hassan, "Branham's sermons lay the foundation to believe that black people are the inferior race."[32] Branham used the term "hybrid" to describe anything he believed to be tainted by the serpent.[32] Branham accused Eve of producing a "hybrid" race, and he provided a way to trace the hybrid line of the Serpent's Seed to Africans and Jews through Ham the biblical progenitor of the African peoples, King Ahab, and Judas Iscariot.[38][39][42]

Branham reported discussing the possibility that blacks were descended from apes as early as 1929, but claimed to reject the belief at the time.[39] In his recorded sermons, Branham first publicly hinted at his belief in the serpent seed doctrine in 1953.[39] He began to openly teach serpent seed in 1958 at the height of racial unrest in the United States.[39]

Doug Weaver, Jon Schambers, and Michael Barkun have investigated Branham's serpent seed doctrine to identify its origin. Weaver suggested that Branham may have become acquainted with the serpent seed doctrine through his Baptist roots.[41] All three have suggested Branham may been influenced by the teachings of Baptist minister Daniel Parker's two-seed doctrine.[43] Although not widely accepted, Parker's teachings were well known among Baptists in Indiana and Kentucky; Parker also connected the serpent's seed to the non-white races.[34][31]

Barkun and Schambers also connected Branham's teaching to the white supremacy movement and Christian Identity preacher Wesley Swift.[44][31] Branham was baptized and ordained by Roy Davis, a founding member and later Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan; Branham and Davis continued to associate throughout Branham's life. Barkun wrote that Branham was the most significant proponent of the racial teaching outside of Wesley Swift and the Christian Identity movement.[44] Steven Hassan described Branham's Serpent Seed teachings as "rebranded" Christian Identity theology.[45][44]

Branham was open about the implications of his beliefs and publicly supported segregation.

God is a segregationalist [sic]. I am too. Any Christian's a segregation. God segregates His people from all the rest of them. They're... They've always been a segregation. He chose a nation. He chooses a people. He is a segregationalist [sic]. He made all nations. But still, a real genuine Christian has to be a segregationalist [sic]. Separating himself from the things of the world and everything, and come into one purpose, Jesus Christ.

— William Branham, Who Do You Say This Is?, December 27, 1964

Branham also openly opposed interracial relationships and connected people of mixed race ancestry to the wicked "hybrid" race of the serpent.

What good would a white woman want to have a baby by a colored man making him a mulatto child? It's not sensible. ... If I was a colored man, or a brown man, or a yellow man, or a red man, I would be just as happy about it. Yes, sir. I sure would. That's the way that my Maker wanted me and that's the way I am. Right. Why does man want to tamper with anything for? When man gets into it, he ruins it. Let it alone the way God made it. Let a man be what he is; by the grace of God let him be. But he has to cause great fusses now calling our... causing riots, and big fusses, and everything else across the nations, and across the world just because he wanted to stick his head out about something. That's the ignorance of the man. That's right; hybrid again. Instead of leaving it the way God wants it, he wants to make his own way. He has to do something about it, you know. He has to make his own self a name. God be merciful to him. It's a pitiful thing.

— William Branham, But It Wasn't So From The Beginning, April 11, 1960

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, "Not all Branham churches are racist or embrace the anti-race-mixing position," "but the theology clearly invites racism."[46] Weaver called Serpent Seed Branham's "most disreputable" doctrine.[41] Branham's embrace of the serpent seed doctrine alienated most of the members of his Pentecostal audience. According to Pearry Green, the broader Pentecostal movement considers Branham's version of the serpent seed doctrine repugnant and in their point of view, it was the "filthy doctrine ... that ruined his ministry."[41] No other mainstream Christian group held a similar view; Branham was widely criticized for spreading the doctrine.[41]

Branham's followers consider the serpent seed doctrine one of his greatest revelations, and his most original; despite its racial nature, most are unaware of the origins of the teaching within the white supremacy movement.[41] When confronted with the accusations of racism, some of his followers have denied the teaching of serpent seed has any connection to white supremacy or racism, and have pointed out that non-white followers of Branham accept the doctrine and its implications.[47] Some African followers of Branham's teachings have embraced the racial components and openly call for the "submission of the black man to the white man".[48][49] Hassan wrote that Branham's followers use "deceptive tactics to recruit and indoctrinate unsuspecting people," and that "recruiters do not tell new members" about the historic "deep ties to white supremacy groups."[32] Leaders in Branham's movement have taken actions to prevent followers from discovering the true origin of the serpent seed teaching.[32]

Eschatology and the Seven Seals edit

 
A pyramid monument at the grave of Jehovah's Witness founder Charles Taze Russell (1852–1916), early preacher of the church ages and the first to claim to be the Laodicean Messenger. Russell's teachings were a major influence on Branham.

In his later years, Branham began to preach almost exclusively on biblical prophecy. In 1960, Branham preached a series of sermons on the seven church ages based on chapters two and three of the Book of Revelation. The sermons used the dispensational system of C. I. Scofield, Clarence Larkin, and Jehovah's Witness founder Charles Taze Russell.[50] As in their dispensational systems, Branham said each church represents a historical age, and that the angel of each age was a significant church figure. Branham identified historical Christian figures as church age messengers, naming some of the same men as Russell.[51]

Whereas Russell had claimed to be the seventh messenger himself during the 1890s, Branham's sermons differed and he described his own characteristics as the attributes of the Laodicean Church age messenger; Branham believed the age would immediately precede the rapture.[52] Branham explained the Laodicean age would be immoral in a way comparable to Sodom and Gomorrah, and it would be a time in which Christian denominations rejected Christ.[53] As described by Branham, the characteristics of the Laodicean age resemble the modern era.[52]

Branham also asserted the final messenger would be a mighty prophet who put the Word of God first, that he would be a lover of the wilderness, that he would hate wicked women, and be an uneducated person.[54] Branham compared the messenger to this last age to John the Baptist and said he would come in the spirit of Elijah the prophet and cited the Book of Malachi 4:5–6 (3:23–24 in Hebrew) as the basis for claiming the Elijah spirit would return.[30][55][56][30][57]

Branham preached a series of sermons in 1963 on the Seven Seals, which he regarded as a highlight of his ministry.[58] Branham believed the sermons would produce "rapturing faith" which was necessary for his followers to escape the tribulation, and that the sermons contained "the complete revelation of Jesus Christ".[59] Weaver wrote that "the importance of the revelation of the seals to Branham's 'prophetic' identity cannot be overestimated".[59] Branham viewed the revelation of the seals as the crowning achievement of his ministry and the ultimate fulfillment of his purpose as a prophet.[59]

According to Weaver, the sermons were primarily "a restatement of the dispensationalism espoused in the sermons on the seven church ages".[60] The sermons focused on the Book of Revelation 6:1–17, and provided an interpretation of the meaning of each of the seals, which Branham connected with his prior sermons on the church ages. Like his sermons on the church ages, Branham's sermons on the seals were largely borrowed from the writings of Charles Taze Russell and Clarence Larkin.[58]

Branham claimed the sermons were inspired through an angelic visitation and the appearance of what he believed to be a supernatural cloud in Arizona that was visible in the American Southwest on February 28, 1963. Branham interpreted the cloud to be the face of Jesus Christ, and a fulfillment of 1 Thessalonians 4:16: "For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout". Branham believed the events of 1963 indicated the rapture was imminent. As a result of his teachings, many of Branham's followers believe that Jesus Christ returned in some form in 1963.[61]

By 1987, it was widely known the cloud Branham believed to be supernatural had been manmade and was reported as such by Weaver in his first biography of Branham.[61] James McDonald of the University of Arizona Institute of Atmospheric Physics was present when the 1963 cloud phenomena appeared. He investigated the phenomena and discovered that the cloud had been created by an exploded Thor rocket carrying a classified spy satellite launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base that failed to make orbit.[62][61][63]

The United States Air Force later declassified the launch records and acknowledged the manmade origin of the cloud. Military personnel involved in the launch stated that they had "immediately recognized the McDonald cloud as from an explosion of a rocket the afternoon of 28 February 1963".[64][60][65] Branham claimed to his audiences that he was hunting in Arizona when angels appeared to him and created the cloud overhead. Peter Duyzer presented evidence that Branham falsely claimed to be hunting in Arizona when the cloud appeared, and was actually in Texas where he was assisting with efforts to have the death sentence of Leslie Elaine Perez overturned.[66]

In his sermons on the seven seals, Branham again indicated he was a prophet who had the anointing of Elijah and was a messenger heralding the second coming of Christ.[18][67] Branham did not directly claim to be the end-time messenger in either of his sermons on the church ages or the seven seals.[68][36] Weaver believed Branham desired to be the eschatological prophet he was preaching about,[68] but had self-doubt.[69] At the time, Branham continued to leave the identity of the messenger open to the interpretation of his followers, who widely accepted that he was that messenger.[69]

Beginning in 1958, Branham began to claim Luke 17:30 was being fulfilled. By the 1960s, he began to make frequent references to the scripture claiming that through his ministry the "Son of Man was being revealed".[54][a] According to Weaver, Branham's "obsession with Luke 17:30 and Malachi 4:5–6 dominated the end of his ministry".[70] In 1964 and 1965 he began to make special emphasis that the Son of Man could only be revealed through the ministry of a prophet. Branham's teachings on the subject caused confusion among his followers who repeatedly asked him to clarify his relationship to Christ. Some of his followers believed he was claiming divinity and were prepared to accept his claims.[71]

Branham's responses and statements on the subject of his divinity were contradictory, leaving his followers divided on the subject.[71] In his final revival meetings before his death, Branham stated "The Elijah of this day is the Lord Jesus Christ. He is to come according to Luke 17:30. The Son of Man is to reveal Himself among His people. Not a man, God. But it'll come through a prophet."[71] His final statement on the subject convinced a number of his followers he was indeed claiming divinity.[71]

Anti-denominationalism edit

Branham believed denominationalism was "a mark of the beast", which added to the controversy surrounding his later ministry.[21][18][b] Branham stated that he was not opposed to organizational structures; his concern focused on the "road block to salvation and spiritual unity" he believed denominations created by emphasizing loyalty to their organizations.[21] Branham's doctrine was similar to the anti-Catholic rhetoric of classical Pentecostalism and Protestantism, which commonly associated the mark of the beast with Catholicism.[72]

Branham, however, adopted the teaching of Charles Taze Russell which associated the image of the beast with Protestant denominations.[73][c] In his later years, he came to believe all denominations were "synagogues of Satan".[16] Branham's teaching was particularly damaging to his relationship with Pentecostal denominations who were angered that he would associate them with the mark of beast.[3]

Scholar Robert Price and Doug Weaver suggested that Branham's stance on denominations was developed in response to their rejection of his teachings in an attempt to maintain the loyalty of his closest followers.[3] Throughout the 1960s, Branham demanded his listeners leave any denomination they were part of to demonstrate their loyalty to him and his message.[74] He argued that continued allegiance to any denomination would lead to an acceptance of the mark of the beast, which would mean missing the rapture.[75] He insisted the prior healing revival when he cooperated with denominations had been a preparatory step to get the attention of God's chosen people, so he could eventually inform them of their need to exclusively follow his teaching ministry.[5]

Prophecies edit

Branham issued a series of prophecies during his lifetime. One of his first was a prophetic vision he reported having in 1916 foretelling that 16 men would fall to their death during the construction of the Clark Memorial Bridge. Branham claimed repeatedly throughout his ministry that the vision was fulfilled during the 1927–1929 construction of the bridge, but there is no evidence of the drownings having ever occurred.[76] Branham also claimed that he foretold the coming of the 1937 Ohio River Flood, the same flood he told his audience led to the death of his wife and daughter.[77]

 
A General Motors self-driving 1956 Firebird II

His most significant prophecies were a series of prophetic visions he claimed to have in June 1933. The first time he published any information about the visions were in 1953. Branham reported that in his visions he saw seven major events would occur before the Second Coming of Christ, including the prediction of the rise of Adolf Hitler, the Second World War, the Italian occupation of Ethiopia, and the rise of communism. Most of his predictions had already been fulfilled by the first time he reported the visions in 1953.[30][61]

In the 1933 visions, he reported seeing self-driving "egg-shaped" cars in one vision. Branham later claimed he saw a car in 1960 that fulfilled his vision. Among the prophecies was also a prediction that the United States would "elect the wrong president" as a result of giving women the right to vote, which he later interpreted to be John F. Kennedy.[30][61] He also predicted a powerful woman would take control of the United States, which he later interpreted to be the Roman Catholic Church, which he reported as also being fulfilled with the election of Kennedy who was Roman Catholic. His visions ended with the apocalyptic destruction of the United States that left the nation's cities in smoldering ruins.[78] After sharing his prophetic visions, Branham offered a prediction that the rapture would happen by 1977.[30][61]

In 1964, Branham said judgement would strike the west coast of the United States and that Los Angeles would sink into the ocean, his most dramatic prediction.[61] Following the 1964 prophecy, Branham again predicted the rapture would happen by 1977 and would be preceded by various worldwide disasters, the unification of denominational Christianity, and the rise-to-power of the Roman Catholic Pope.[30] Branham was deeply anti-Catholic, and viewed the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church as the agents of Satan who would bring about the end of the world. Branham's prediction of the end of the world by 1977 was widely circulated and well known. After the world failed to end in 1977, Time Magazine included the failed prediction as one of the "top ten end-of-the-world prophecies".[79]

Weaver wrote that Branham gradually revised and embellished some of his prophecies over time, sometimes substantially.[80] Critics of Branham investigated his prophecies. They claimed that many of Branham prophecies were only publicly reported after their fulfillment. Duzyer also reported that several of Branham's prophecies, like the 16 drownings or the destruction of the United States, were never fulfilled.[81] Branham's followers believe his prophecies came true, or will do so in the future.[60]

Notes edit

  1. ^ "Let me close by saying this: that the Son of man is now being revealed from heaven. "Will it come after while, Brother Branham?" It is now." William Branham, Called Out – January 9, 1958
  2. ^ Weaver records Branham believed it was "the mark of the beast", whereas Harrell records he believed it was "a mark of the beast".
  3. ^ "... he is now operating to produce a Protestant 'image of the beast' with life, which will cooperate with the chief Antichrist..." Russel, The Finished Mystery, p. 272

References edit

  1. ^ Kydd 1998, p. 176.
  2. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 118, 98.
  3. ^ a b c d e Weaver 2000, p. 118.
  4. ^ a b c d e Weaver 2000, p. 98.
  5. ^ a b c d Harrell 1978, p. 164.
  6. ^ Kydd 1998, pp. 173–174.
  7. ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 121.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Weaver 2000, p. 86.
  9. ^ a b c d e f Weaver 2000, pp. v–vi.
  10. ^ a b c d e Moriarty 1992, p. 53.
  11. ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 56.
  12. ^ a b Moriarty 1992, p. 54.
  13. ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 55.
  14. ^ a b c Weaver 2000, pp. 117–118.
  15. ^ Douglas Gordon Jacobsen. (2006) A Reader in Pentecostal Theology: Voices from the First Generation, Indiana University Press. ISBN 0253218624 p. 31.
  16. ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 117.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g Weaver 2000, p. 119.
  18. ^ a b c d e Harrell 1978, p. 163.
  19. ^ a b c d e Weaver 2000, p. 120.
  20. ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 108.
  21. ^ a b c d e f Weaver 2000, p. 114.
  22. ^ Niebuhr 1975, p. 45.
  23. ^ Weaver 2000, p. 17, 41.
  24. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 109, 111.
  25. ^ a b c d e f Weaver 2000, p. 111.
  26. ^ a b c d e f g h Weaver 2000, p. 109.
  27. ^ Kydd 1998, p. 169.
  28. ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 110.
  29. ^ Weaver 2000, p. 112.
  30. ^ a b c d e f g Babinski 1995, p. 277.
  31. ^ a b c Schamber, Jon F. Mystical Anti-Semitism and the Christian Identity Movement (PDF). Stockton, CA: University of the Pacific. pp. 10–11.
  32. ^ a b c d e Hassan, Steven (September 28, 2021). "The Racist Effects of William Branham's Message Churches". Freedom of Mind Institute. Retrieved September 28, 2021.
  33. ^ Weaver 2000, p. 113.
  34. ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 125.
  35. ^ Moriarty 1992, p. 50.
  36. ^ a b Kydd 1998, p. 174.
  37. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 124–125.
  38. ^ a b Burkun 1997, p. 162.
  39. ^ a b c d e Weaver 2000, p. 124.
  40. ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 122.
  41. ^ a b c d e f Weaver 2000, p. 123.
  42. ^ Lennie, Tom (September 9, 2021). "Review: Preacher Behind the White Hoods". Prophecy Today UK. Retrieved September 12, 2021.
  43. ^ Burkun 1997, pp. 161.
  44. ^ a b c Burkun 1997, pp. 160–162.
  45. ^ Hassan, Steven (May 5, 2022). "The Message Cult". Freedom of Mind Institute. Retrieved May 12, 2022.
  46. ^ "Tennessee Pastor Thunders Against Interracial Relationships". Southern Poverty Law Center. May 24, 2014. Retrieved April 19, 2022.
  47. ^ Blair, Leonardo (February 19, 2014). "Bro. Donny Reagan Apologizes; Church Explains His Message Saying He's Not Racist, He 'Simply Does Not Marry Interracially'". Christian Post.
  48. ^ Lucie Sarr, Abidjan (July 9, 2017). "Apostle of self-styled 'only prophet of God on earth' arrested in West Africa". Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  49. ^ Cherus, John (February 9, 2019). "Ivory Coast Kacou Philippe Pardoned". KOACI. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  50. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 99, 103, 126.
  51. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 99, 140.
  52. ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 99.
  53. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 129–130.
  54. ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 129.
  55. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 129, 140.
  56. ^ Larson 2004, p. 79.
  57. ^ Moriarty 1992, pp. 49–50.
  58. ^ a b Weaver 2000, pp. 99–100.
  59. ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 102.
  60. ^ a b c Weaver 2000, p. 101.
  61. ^ a b c d e f g Weaver 2000, p. 103.
  62. ^ McDonald, James (April 19, 1963). "Stratospheric Cloud Over Northern Arizona". Science Magazine. pp. 9–10.
  63. ^ McDonald, James (June 15, 1963). "Cloud Ring In The Upper Stratosphere" (PDF). Weatherwise. pp. 99–148.
  64. ^ Jackson, Jeff G. (January 26, 1995), 30th Space Wing History, Vandenberg AFB, California: Department of the Air Force, pp. 1–2
  65. ^ Collins, John (August 14, 2020). "The Impact of William Branham's UFO Theology on Peoples Temple". San Diego State University. Retrieved August 14, 2021.
  66. ^ Duyzer 2014, pp. 118–127.
  67. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 99, 128.
  68. ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 128.
  69. ^ a b Weaver 2000, p. 133.
  70. ^ Weaver 2000, p. 131.
  71. ^ a b c d Weaver 2000, p. 132.
  72. ^ Weaver 2000, p. 115.
  73. ^ Weaver 2000, p. 116.
  74. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 116–118.
  75. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 116–117.
  76. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 22–23.
  77. ^ Weaver 2000, p. 22.
  78. ^ Weaver 2000, p. 29.
  79. ^ Rawlings, Nate (May 10, 2011). "William Branham and the Pentecostal Prediction". Time Magazine. Retrieved February 18, 2022.
  80. ^ Weaver 2000, pp. 30–31.
  81. ^ Duyzer 2014, pp. 61–83.

Bibliography edit

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Branhamism&oldid=1216200277"