Antiaromaticity
Antiaromatic molecules are cyclic systems containing alternating single and double bonds, where the pi electron energy of antiaromatic compounds is higher than that of its open-chain counterpart. Therefore antiaromatic compounds are unstable and highly reactive; often antiaromatic compounds distort themselves out of planarity to resolve this instability. Antiaromatic compounds fail Hückel's rule of aromaticity i.e. 4n+2 pi electrons.
Examples of antiaromatic systems are cyclobutadiene (A), the cyclopentadienyl cation (B) and the cyclopropenyl anion (C). Cyclooctatetraene is a 4n system but neither aromatic or antiaromatic because the molecule escapes a planar geometry.
By adding or removing an electron pair via a redox reaction, a π system can become aromatic and therefore more stable than the original non- or anti-aromatic compound, for instance the cyclooctatetraenide dianion. The IUPAC criteria for antiaromaticity are as follows:[1]
- The molecule must have 4n π electrons where n is any integer.
- The molecule must be cyclic.
- The molecule must have a conjugated pi electron system.
- The molecule must be planar.
However, most chemists agree on the definition based on empirical (or simulated) energetic observations.[citation needed]
It is observed that the energy difference between aromatic and antiaromatic compounds diminishes with increasing size.[2] For instance the 12-pi system diphenylene is an antiaromatic compound but stable and even commercially available. The low energy penalty for antiaromaticity is also demonstrated in certain pyrazine-dihydropyrazine pairs:
The compound on the left is a 14 pi-electron aromatic compound (NICS value –26.1 ppm) which can be reduced in a strongly exothermic reaction to the 16 pi-electron antiaromatic compound (NICS +27.7 ppm) on the right.[3] The dihydropyrazine slowly converts back to the pyrazine under the action of oxygen. It shows that other electronic factors can overpower aromaticity.
|
|
This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (September 2010) |
Antiaromaticity is also observed in a chemical equilibrium between these two porphyrin derivatives:[4]
A regular porphyrin is an 18 electron aromatic compound (not counting two non-contributing double bonds) but on substituting a pyrrole ring by a meta-phenylene ring aromaticity is lost due to lack of conjugation. In this system the phenylene group is also a phenol and structure A is found to interconvert with 20 electron antiaromat B via keto-enol tautomerism. Antiaromaticity is evident from NMR spectroscopy with the inner NH protons shifting downfield by 10 ppm to 21 ppm. The NICS values compare +0.7 for A (non-aromatic) and +5 (antiaromatic) for B and other computer simulations predict that B is actually more stable than A.
References
- ^ Compendium of Chemical Terminology, antiaromatic compounds, accessed 1 Feb 2007.
- ^ A Thiadiazole-Fused N,N-Dihydroquinoxaline: Antiaromatic but Isolable Shaobin Miao, Paul v. R. Schleyer, Judy I. Wu, Kenneth I. Hardcastle, and Uwe H. F. Bunz Org. Lett.; 2007; 9(6) pp 1073 - 1076; (Letter) doi:10.1021/ol070013i
- ^ Reducing agent: Sodium hypophosphite, tips stands for triisopropylsilyl
- ^ 22-Hydroxybenziporphyrin: Switching of Antiaromaticity by Phenol-Keto Tautomerization Marcin Stpie, Lechosaw Latos-Grayski, and Ludmia Szterenberg J. Org. Chem.; 2007; 72(7) pp 2259 - 2270; (Article) doi:10.1021/jo0623437
