Talk:Grumman EA-6B Prowler
(Redirected from Talk:Northrop Grumman EA-6B Prowler)
Latest comment: 2 days ago by Polyamorph in topic Requested move 23 May 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grumman EA-6B Prowler article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 23 May 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Northrop Grumman EA-6B Prowler to Grumman EA-6B Prowler. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Grumman/Northrop Grumman edit
The convention for aircraft articles seems to be to keep the name of the original manufacturer. So for example, the article for the F-15 is still "McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle" despite the plane now being produced by Boeing. So I'd say this article's title should be changed to "Grumman EA-6B Prowler" —Masterblooregard (talk) 03:13, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Completely agree with this statement, on all points:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_F-15_Eagle
- It is eleven-and-a-half years later. Why has this change not been enacted?
- Most of us do not have the ability to do this. Can someone with appropriate authority please review this. 2A00:23C7:3131:FE01:C5FA:6037:9855:5FE0 (talk) 18:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 23 May 2024 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Polyamorph (talk) 07:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Northrop Grumman EA-6B Prowler → Grumman EA-6B Prowler – Why does Northrop Grumman, a corporation formed in 1994, get credit for an aircraft that first flew in 1968? Rename per WP:AIR/NC. Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1992–93. Schierbecker (talk) 01:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Aviation and WikiProject Military history have been notified of this discussion. Schierbecker (talk) 22:02, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support for a different reason - Had production of the EA-6B continued after the Northrop Grumman merger, I would oppose this move. However, since Northrop Grumman never built the EA-6B, it makes no sense to use that manufacturer in this title. Per WP:AIR/NC, "Be wary of using non-contemporary names like Boeing DC-3 or British Aerospace Spitfire." - ZLEA T\C 03:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support: Use the company name when aircraft were being manufactured. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:06, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per nom and Fnlayson. I'm surprised there's no convention on this. I would go with the design and initial production firm in most cases, although I see the C-17 is listed under Boeing, not Douglas or McDonnell Douglas. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.